295510

Research paper writing help
Essay Topic: Digital divide of intellectual property between Third world countries and first world countries. Limited access to technology: wealthy verse poor.
Minimum 10 – maximum 12 double spaced pages in 12 point font, excluding bibliography and any tables or figures. Use as many sources as you need.
Term papers can be written on any subject of interest to the student that has relevance and implications with respect to how intellectual property affects any aspect of human communication.
Papers must be fully documented and referenced in an accepted scholarly style (e.g. MLA, Harvard etc.).
Pre-done research/Topics to touch on:
o IP affairs were coordinated by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
• Un agency
• Upholding Berne and Paris conventions
• Responsibility for reflecting the interests of all UN Member states regardless of level of development
• WIPO remains treaty organization
• History of IP Trade:
o Troubling
o A lot of it had to do with the technology advancement
o 1970: group of 77 developing countries
• Technological hegemony
• Cannot get access to technology developed countries have access too,
• Arguing for protection, But never actually got answer
o 1980: US position of IP changes
• US against monopoly, individualism, toughest anti trust legislation
• Aggressively promoting free trade becoming the rational for reforming the IP systems
• Technology changing and getting smaller: industry was changing,
• IT changed attitude towards IP
o Towards TRIPS
• Failed attempts to revise Paris convention AND developing country themselves changed their attitudes

💡 Buy the answer for only $12 Get it now →

, became disenchanted
• **Milti-fibre Agreement** trade was not restricted to the type of fibre being sold. >>Developing countries
o Digital rights management
• Device based IP protection (DCMA-1998)
• Fair use rights? Who is protecting us? No one.
• DCMA prevents dissemination of knowledge about DRM
• No wrong to put protection on property, but the concept of balance has completely disappeared.
• IRONY:
• The economic logic of knowledge
• Verses the commercial logic of protecting IP
• Inventions of new models (eg. iTunes) saves the content industries
• Another issue:
• Genetic resources ex. Inuit/tribal society
o Toronto case recently
o Traditional knowledge
• Key lessons:
o Not a “natural” right
• HAD TO BE CONTSTRUCTED IN SOME WAY
o Ongoing political and economic negotiations between interest groups
• Definition and characteristics have always been and will always be in negotiation based on social and economic situations
o A process biased historically to producers NOT creators
o An uneasy fit with normal principles of law
• Ex. Fair use rights
o Difficult fit with the dynamics of knowledge
• Historical mythologies, and contradictions
o Ex. Industrialization did NOT develop ways to develop IP
• Because it was too difficult to obtain
o Was not OUTSIDE THE IP system
Issue: not an economic issue but a political legitimacy
• Unattainable levels of protection over ‘property’ that is abstractly defines.
• Impossible of policy
• Moral symettitry between the Law and moral practice
• = problems
Adam smith-invisible hand?
This is property of termpaperchampions.com. Log in to Buy an essay online from us.

💡 Buy the answer for only $12 Get it now →