1 ACCT5930 – MYOB Financial Reporting Simulation Part 3 – Rubric – 2022T1 Criteria Compone nt of overall grade Fail 0% Pass / Credit / Distinction 50% to 84% High Distinction 85% or 100% Cash flow statement for the month ended 31/12/2021 in Excel format 6 Incorrect format submitted, i.e. not Excel format Incorrect Business Name. No Business Name included in the Excel file. Not attempted Correct Business Name included in the file in the indicated spaces Some Cash Flows are calculated correctly Some cash flows are missing Cash flow statement as at Dec 2021 Correct format Excel file submitted Correct Business Name included in the file in the indicated spaces All Cash Flows are calculated correctly Cash flow statement as at Dec 2021 is prepared correctly including amounts and the names of the cash flows match those in the lecture slides/tutorial answers, i.e. are correct descriptions and do not include the accrual revenue/expense versions of names. Criteria Compone nt of overall grade Fail 0% to 49% Pass 50% to 64% Credit 65% to 74% Distinction 75% to 84% High Distinction 85% or 100% Management Commentary 5 Unclear written communications. No document submitted Not written in professional business language. Poor grammar, spelling, punctuation, concepts were not clear, writing is difficult to read. Structure is confusing. Does not adhere to the word limit and size of font limit guidelines. Does not address the components requested for Generally well- written communications, but some ideas are not clearly explained. Is written somewhat in professional business language. Some grammatical errors, sentences were clear and Communications are clearly written and articulate. Formatting is consistent and well presented. Is written in average level professional business language. Minor grammatical errors, sentences were clear and complete, format was used to aid the audience Communications are professionally presented and are persuasive. Is written in g
ood professional business language. Free of grammatical errors. Format was clear. Sentences were well constructed. Language was concise. Excellent use of relevant graphics. Well- developed paragraphs. Communications are very eloquently written and presented and are highly persuasive. Is written in highly professional business language. Free of grammatical errors. Format was clear, logical and consistent. Sentences were well constructed. Exceptional use of clearly relevant graphics. Clear and well-developed 2 in the information document. Did not follow the instructions provided in Part 3 of the Information Document. complete, clear formatting, some diagrams, but not explained and only decorative. Poor paragraph structure (1-2 sentence paragraphs). Adheres to the word limit and size of font guidelines. Reasonable attempt at addressing the components requested for in the information document. Did follow the instructions provided in Part 3 of the Information Document. including relevant graphics, style and content are mostly consistent. Some paragraph structure problems Adheres to the page and size of font guidelines. Generally, expresses complex ideas into well- reasoned arguments. Somewhat effective attempt at addressing the components requested for in the information document. Did follow the instructions provided in Part 3 of the Information Document. Adheres to the word limit and size of font guidelines. Consistently and skilfully represents complex ideas into well-reasoned arguments. Good attempt at addressing the components requested for in the information document. Did follow the instructions provided in Part 3 of the Information Document. paragraphs. Adheres to the word limit and size of font guidelines. Consistently and eloquently represents complex ideas into well-reasoned arguments. Excellent attempt at addressing the components requested for in the information document. Did follow the instructions provided in Part 3 of the Information Document.