MGTS7603 Strategic Human Resources Management – Semester 1, 2022 Assessment 3: Current issues in SHRM in organisations Marking Criteria (Weighting 40%) MARKING CRITERIA HD – (100%) D – (84%) C – (74%) P – (64%) F – (49%) No Attempt – 0% 1. Demonstrated a clear articulation of the issues/problems (5%) Excellent and concise articulation of the issues/problems and statement showing why it is important to address the issues/problems in the organisation Well-presented and concise articulation of the issues/problems and statement showing why it is important to address the issues/problems in the organisation Good concise articulation of the issues/problems and statement showing why it is important to address the issues/problems in the organisation Useful articulation of the issues/problems and statement showing why it is important to address the issues/problems in the organisation Unclear articulation of the issues/problems and unclear statement showing why it is important to address the issues/problems in the organisation No attempt 2. Critical analysis of the internal and external environments of the organisations (10%) Insightful critical analysis of the organisation’s internal and external environments using highly relevant analytical tools from HRM/business Thoughtful critical analysis of the organisation’s internal and external environments using relevant analytical tools from HRM/business Useful critical analysis of the organisation’s internal and external environments using appropriate analytical tools from HRM/business A critical analysis of the organisation’s internal and external environments using analytical tools from HRM/business that are inappropriate No critical analysis of the organisation’s internal and external environments. No analytical tools from HRM/business were used to understand the internal and external environments No attempt 3. Critical assessment of the SHRM issues/problems and demonstrated knowledge of the SHRM literature to understand the issues/problems (10%) All issues/problems were identified and critically examined comprehensively including the antecedents to the problem, using relevant SHRM/business theories or frameworks Almost all the key issues/problems were critically examined reasonably including the antecedents to the problem, using appropriate SHRM/business theories or frameworks The key issues/problems were critically examined adequately including some of the antecedents to the problem, using mostly general SHRM/business theories or frameworks Most of the issues/ problems were not critically examined appropriately and the antecedents to the problem needs clarity. Inappropriate SHRM/business theor
ies or frameworks were used No examination of key issues/ problems including the antecedents to the problem. No SHRM/business theories or frameworks were used. No attempt 4.Solutions/recommen dations based on evidence and ethical implications. Two alternative solutions proposed (10%) Solutions/recommendations are practical, feasible and logically flow from the analysis. Excellent justification based on evidence and ethical implications. Highly relevant two proposed alternative solutions. Solutions/recommendations are clear, useful and logically flow from the analysis. Good justification based on evidence and ethical implications. Relevant two proposed alternative solutions. Solutions/recommendations are appropriate and logically flow from the analysis. Clear justification based on some evidence and some understanding of ethical implications. Appropriate two proposed alternative solutions. Solutions/recommendation s are somewhat appropriate but do not flow from the analysis. Some justification provided with little/no evidence and/or ethical implications. Only one proposed alternative solution seems appropriate Solutions/recommendation s need to be clear, feasible and practical. No justification provided based on evidence and ethical implications. No alternative solutions proposed No attempt 5. Communication and Lessons Learned (5%) Excellent and very clear structure. All sections completed within page limit. Excellent communication. No more than 2 minor mistakes/errors in grammar, syntax and spelling. Reference list and in-text citations are consistently accurate throughout. Highly relevant two key lessons learned. Clear structure. All sections completed within page limit. Very good communication. No more than 3-4 mistakes/errors in grammar, syntax and spelling. Reference list and in-text citations is consistent throughout. Relevant two key lessons learned. Basic structure. Most sections completed within page limit. Basic communication. No more than 5-6 mistakes/errors in grammar, syntax and spelling. Reference list and in- text citations mostly consistent throughout. Some minor inaccuracies or errors. Appropriate two lessons learned. Adequate structure. An attempt to fulfil all sections within page limit. More than 7 to 10 mistakes, errors in grammar, syntax and spelling. Reference list and in-text citations not consistent throughout. Inaccuracies or errors evident. Only one lessons learned reported Unclear structure with little to no attempt to fulfil all sections within page limit. Weak communication with mistakes, errors in grammar, syntax and spelling throughout. References missing and significant in-text citation errors throughout. No lessons learned No attempt