Management School – Undergraduate Coursework Specification 2020-2021 Module Code: MGT226 Coursework Code: MGT226-2 Module Title: Human Resource Management Date Available: 07/02/2022 Submission details: 27th May, 12pm (noon) Electronic submission only through Blackboard. You
are now allowed to utilise the Turnitin Check before the assignment
deadline which can be accessed via the information room. This allows you to generate an originality report and use this to improve your referencing and citation skills. Please note: Turnitin Check is NOT the final submission – you still need to submit your work to the Assignment Link on the module Blackboard site, otherwise it will be marked as Not Submitted. You
should note that the time of submission is taken from once the document
has been successfully uploaded and confirmed – this may take more than five minutes during busy periods. Late penalties will be applied to any work submitted from 12.01pm on 27th May onwards. Details of how to calculate a late penalty can be found in your programme Handbook. It is your responsibility to ensure the correct document/file has uploaded successfully. When submitting students must: 1. Include a completed cover sheet (available from Blackboard (MOLE)) 2. Use ‘Student Number, MGTXXX-1’ (e.g. 190011001 MGT226-2) as the document’s file name and also as the Assignment Title in Turnitin. Contribution to Final Mark for Module: 60% Maximum Word Length: 2000 words The
word count is for the main body of the text and ignores the reference
list and appendices. If you exceed the word length you will be penalised. For details see the Management School Handbooks. Please note that SUMS does not have a word count tolerance – it is a stated maximum as outlined above. Requirements: You are required to pick ONE of the following questions and write an essay answer of 2,000 words. Please
note that you must choose a topic different from Assignment 1. For
example, if you chose Recruitment for assignment 1, you cannot choose question n. 3 for Assignment 2. For all questions, the model answer will be structured in three sections: introduction, main body and conclusions. The introduction will briefly outline the main relevant issues and explain how the answer is structured. The
main body will define and critically examine key relevant concepts and
theories and it might also include examples from case studies or personal work experience. This section will provide arguments both for and against the theories analysed. The conclusion will summarise key issues and provide an overall critical reflection. Questions 1)
Critically discuss the terms integration and responsiveness in the
context of IHRM. What effect can these have on how organisations are structured, the nature of the parent-subsidiary relationship, and the flow of knowledge across them 2)
Diversity management theories, policies and practices can be based on
arguments of social justice or business needs. Compare and contrast these two perspectives and explore whether there are overlaps and similarities between the two. 3)
The use of psychometric testing in selection has attracted numerous
criticisms. Critically discuss them and identify what HR managers could do to address and mitigate the limitations of psychometric testing.
4) “According to some, there is little point in training and developing
employees if the jobs they are to undertake are tightly controlled with
no trust or discretion given” Critically discuss this statement,
making references to two learning theories, and exploring their
effectiveness in training programmes for highly standardised jobs and for jobs with high level of autonomy and discretion. 5) Performance can be measured in different ways. Some of them focus more on employee control, others on employee development. Critically discuss two different approaches to performance, examining whether they are more inclined toward control or toward development. 6)
Critically discuss ethical absolutism, ethical relativism, and ethical
pluralism, explaining how these different perspectives might impact HRM strategies, policies and practices of an organisation operating in different continents. Assessment criteria <40% (Fail) 40-44% (Pass) 45-49% (3rd class) 50-59% (2.2 ) 60-69% (2.1) 70-79 % (1st class) 80 % and above (1st class) Reference to relevant theoretical frameworks Lacks any reference to theory Refers briefly to theories, but does not show how they are relevant to the topic covered. Refers briefly to theories, but does not fully/clearly explain how they are relevant to the topic covered. Refers briefly to relevant theories and broadly shows how the
y are relevant to the topic covered. Refers to relevant theories and shows carefully how they are relevant to the topic covered. Explains and critically evaluates relevant theories, relating them to the topic covered. Deep and comprehensive explanation of relevant theories, with clear indications of substantial independent reading and reflections. Evidence of critical and original thinking in linking theories and the topic covered. Analysis of the chosen topic Insufficient information is given OR the description is very long, with no analysis OR no references to relevant literature Very rudimentary analysis, with major omissions and/or flaws. Superficial references to the literature. Rudimentary analysis, with some omissions and/or flaws. Superficial references to the literature. Satisfactory analysis demonstrating some knowledge of the topic and the ability to make some reference to relevant theories Good analysis, demonstrating a reasonable understanding of the topic and the ability to engage with relevant theories. Very good analysis, demonstratin g a sound understandin g of the topic and ability to engage with relevant theories in a critical and reflective manner. Outstanding and insightful analysis, demonstrating sophisticated understanding of the topic and ability to engage with relevant theories in a critical, original and reflective manner. Clarity of Arguments Lack of clear arguments Unclear, confusing arguments throughout the assignment. Unclear, confusing arguments in some sections of the assignment. Generally clear, but some sketchy and underdeveloped arguments throughout the assignment. Clear arguments throughout the assignment. Clear and well- constructed arguments throughout the assignment. Convincing, fully developed and consistent arguments throughout the assignment. Structure and Presentation Unclear written English and grammatical errors. Poor presentation and structure. English is understandable, but there are several grammatical errors. Weak presentation and structure. English is understandable, but some aspects could be explained more clearly. Weak presentation and structure. Presentation competently structured and generally acceptable grammar and spelling Presentation logically structured, using acceptable grammar and spelling Excellent, well directed presentation, logically structured, and using acceptable grammar and spelling . Exceptional presentation, logically structured, using acceptable grammar and spelling. Superb skills in communicating knowledge and complex information Criteria Referencing Inadequate reference to sources. Some references are correct, but many presents mistakes and inaccuracies, The referencing is quite carefully carried out but should be refined further. Referencing is generally carefully carried out, but there are a small number of minor mistakes. Referencing is carefully carried out. Referencing is very carefully carried out. Excellent use of the Harvard referencing system and an outstanding level of competence Referencing:
you must reference your work correctly using the Harvard method.
Failure to do so will result in the deduction of marks and possible proceedings under the University’s Regulations as to the Use of Unfair Means Independence of working: You
are reminded of the University’s Regulations on the Use of Unfair Means
and academic integrity which are outlined in the School’s Handbooks.
If there is a suspicion that your work is not your own and that you
have used unfair means or there is suspicion of a breach of
academic integrity in writing this assessment then you may be referred
to our unfair means officers to consider your work. Therefore, you
are advised to ensure that you undertake the relevant guidance on the
module site or programme level sites that you have access too. If you cannot access these, please contact the Student Experience Office. Other Submission Details: Use the standard Management School cover sheet Have the word count given on the cover sheet Be presented with 2.5cm margins all round Use Times New Roman or Arial, 11 or 12 point for the main body text Use 1.5 line spacing Have all pages numbered except the first Be properly spell checked Be made attractive with suitable use of headings, paragraphs and sections Be properly referenced to the Management School version of Harvard referencing Resit: The
resit will be based on the specifications outlined in this document,
but students must choose a topic different from the original assignment.