Critical Thinking Imagine the following scenario:You are walking to your car in the back corner of an isolated parking lot. A man suddenly appears and approaches you. He has one hand in his coat pocket, and you suspect he may be armed. Is it better for you if this event happens in a state with a three-strikes law, which mandates harsh sentences for a person who commits a violent felony and who already has two previous felony convictions, or in a state without such a law?Write a 500-word paper about this scenario and question, in which you include the following:Describe the problem.Construct at least one critical thinking argument supporting one side of the issue.Construct one creative thinking argument supporting the other side of the issue.Explain the rationale for your arguments.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Answer Preview Problem Description. With the current situat
ion being the approach by a stranger in isolated parking, and the suspicion that he might be armed, the problem lies in the threat that I could be facing if the event occurs in a state with a three-strikes law or one without. The situation presents a dilemma because if the stranger is armed, he could decide to harm me. As such, the occurrence of the event in a state with the three-strikes law could significantly help to save the situation since such a person would be afraid of facing the legal consequences of committing such a violent felony against me (Chen, 2008). On the other hand, its occurrence in a state without such law would encourage the stranger, if armed, to execute his will and walk away. As such, the primary problem, in this case, is whether the existence of a three-strikes law in a state is effective in deterring criminal activities or not
APA 551 words
$8.00 Purchase Checkout