Punishment vs. TreatmentForum #6: Evidence seems to point that despite the fact that get tough policies were designed to protect the social welfare of society they have failed to do so. Central to this argument are three points, the lack of cost effectiveness in punitive interventions as compared to clinical interventions; the lack of a deterrent effect; and they fail to prepare adolescents for adulthood. Provide your thoughts on this evidence. Do you feel based upon the evidence that the punitive justice system has failed to reduce juvenile crime? If so why? Do you feel that rehabilitation can succeed where punitive punishment failed when it comes to crime reduction?Learning Objectives:Debate how juvenile behavior is addressed through the criminal justice system.Instructions: Each students answer to the question should be between 825 words. A minimum of three APA 6th edition citations and references must be used in the development of your answerrefs and citeoutlineAnswer preview Th
e juvenile court system was included in the justice system of the United States of America to avoid adverse results of punishing delinquents and focus more on rehabilitating them. As a result, the working of the juvenile courts include the principles of both the retribution theory and the utilitarian theories. According to the retribution theory, punishment is supposed to be served to offenders so that they pay for their actions and relieve the offended party. The utilitarian approach, on the other hand, is consequentialist, and it focuses on rehabilitation to change the behavior of the youths. Nevertheless, in the 1980 and 1970s, deliquescence increased substantially leading to the implementation of harsher penalties for offenders (Justice Policy Institute, 2009). Therefore, juvenile courts started seeking retribution more than rehabilitation. Nevertheless, the method of thinking has led to several consequences. First, there is a high rate
.. APA 912 words
$16.00 Purchase Checkout